Sunday, May 9, 2010

It takes two to tango

From Wikipedia: “It takes two to tango is a common idiomatic expression which suggests something in which more than one person or other entity are paired in an inextricably-related and active manner, occasionally with negative connotations. The phrase recognizes that there are certain activities which cannot be achieved singly -- like arguing, fighting, making love, dancing the tango.”

Have you ever hated anybody who has never done anything wrong to you? There might be some things which he has done to others or maybe you are generally irritated by that person. But you hate him/her. How much have you hated him/her?

(Ignore any celebrities, like our beloved Mr. Kasab, here. )

And have you ever hated somebody who has done several several wrong things to you? Somebody who has constantly irritated you, been mean to you, hurt you, said hurtful things to you. How much have you hated him/her? More than the guy above? Much more? Much much more? I guess yes.

But this post is not about hatred, it is about love!

Have you ever loved anybody who hasn’t loved you back? Chances are that you have. You adore the person. You have immense respect for the person. You want desperately to be with the person. You simply love the person. Have you ever been in such a situation? If yes, may I ask how much have you loved him/her?

And have you ever loved anybody who has loved you back? Hopefully, you have. You have adored and respected the person, so has he/she. You want to be with him/her as much as him/her. You love the person, you are loved back. If you have been in such a situation, may I again ask how much have you loved him/her?

My point is very simple. Ideally, any one-sided love, in intensity, should be way way inferior to a two-sided love. Just as a one-sided animosity is not even close to an “enemy”. When you love someone and are loved back, there is virtuous cycle which builds. And there is no limit to which this virtuous cycle can take you. It is beautiful, it is divine.

Not to say that one can’t love someone dearly despite not being loved back. You can, and you can do it for eternity. But the intensity should be ideally much lesser than two-sided love. If somebody claims to have an equivalent intensity for someone who does not love him/her back, then there are only two possibilities. Either the person is unaware of what ‘intensity’ can be, or is downright stupid and an emotional fool. There is a need to re-calibrate his/her emotions.

Continuing from wiki: The tango is a dance which requires two partners moving in relation to each other, sometimes in tandem, sometimes in opposition.[2] The meaning of this expression has been extended to include any situation in which the two partners are by definition understood to be essential -- as in, a marriage with only one partner ceases to be a marriage.”

This is how love grows – “two partners moving in relation to each other, sometimes in tandem, sometimes in opposition”. And love keeps growing through a virtuous cycle as long as we don’t get useless negativity in our system and break that cycle.

I have been in love a few times in the past – one-sided as well as relationships. I would always admire, respect and even love all of them, but, “to an extent”. Today I want to declare that I am over each and every one of them. Next time, I want to be able to build and maintain a virtuous cycle. Next time I am in love, I want “no limits”.

- ANAND GAUTAM

9th May 2010

Sunday, April 4, 2010

IPL and how wrong can one be - "Times of India"

There is a general dissatisfaction around the country with the erstwhile great newspaper 'The Times of India'. I have been sensing the downfall over last 4-5 years. I do not read newspaper so religiously, so cannot comment like an expert but a recent statement in today's TOI left me so amazed that I was forced to write this piece.

After Mumbai's win over Deccan yesterday, today's Sunday Times wrote "The Chargers were then dismissed for 115, which made Mumbai the first team in IPL3 to qualify for the semifinals. They are now assured of a fourth-place finish even in the worst case scenario from here on." Bull S**t! Of the highest order!!

There are 8 teams, each playing 14 matches and four teams qualify for the semis. Even the dumbest person would agree that you would have to win 8 out of 14 to be assured of a top 4 finish. Even the dumbest.........TOI is dumber than the dumbest. I played GOD and forced the results of all the matches and Mumbai Indians finish 6th in the worst case scenario!! Apparently the "worst case scenario" of TOI has a very different connotation. Anyway, here is the table which can emerge as a worst case scenario (non-TOI definition). :-

Team Played Won Lost Points
Royal Challengers Bangalore 14 9 5 18
Chennai Super Kings 14 9 5 18
Rajasthan Royals 14 9 5 18
Delhi Daredevils 14 8 6 16
Kolkata Knight Riders 14 8 6 16
Mumbai Indians 14 7 7 14
Deccan Chargers 14 4 10 8
Kings XI Punjab 14 2 12 4

What is most interesting is that even after winning the next match, Mumbai cannot be assured of a top 4 finish - it will come to net run rate. So TOI was not just off in their calculation, they were way way off.

I do not agree that the reporters in TOI are super super dumb and they just don't get it. Almost certainly, there is only on explanation to this. TOI wants to "make news". They want to be the first one to tell the world that Mumbai qualified for the semis. So what, if is it not true! Given the form of MI (and the super run rate), they will surely win another match and qualify for the semis. So why not take a premature credit of being the first one to announce something, even before it has happened, knowing that it will most likely happen!

Any other newspaper will wait for at least two more matches (April 9th, 5 more days) to make the above claim. TOI brings you the same news 5 days earlier than anybody else! 5 full days!! So what if it is not true yet, we are Indians, we have faith, it will come true for sure!!!

I just have one word for this - "disgusting" :)

- Anand Gautam
4th April 2010